Two things decide what your business is worth on an earnings basis: the profit figure you multiply, and the number you multiply it by. Get either one wrong and the answer is wrong by hundreds of thousands.
This article walks through both. You will see exactly which costs get added back to reported profit and why, a full worked example on a business with $180,000 of reported EBITDA, and the 11 things a buyer examines when deciding whether you deserve a 3× multiple or a 5×.
The worked example matters more than it sounds. In it, the add-backs alone move the valuation by $456,000 — on the same business, in the same year, with nothing changed but the way the earnings were presented.
Start with the profit figure, because everything else multiplies it.
What adjusted EBITDA is
Adjusted EBITDA is a measure of operating profit that removes interest, tax, depreciation and amortisation, then normalises the remaining costs to what an ordinary owner would incur. Adjusting the figure strips out spending that belongs to the current owner personally, and one-off items that will not recur for the next one. The purpose of adjusted EBITDA is to show the sustainable earnings a new owner would actually inherit.
That last sentence is the whole test. Every add-back either survives it or it does not.
The add-backs buyers accept
A normalising adjustment restates a cost at its fair market level. An add-back removes a cost entirely because a new owner would not carry it.
The common ones:
- Owner's salary above or below market rate. If you pay yourself $120,000 for a role a manager would fill at $70,000, the $50,000 difference is an adjustment. This one runs both ways — owners who pay themselves nothing must have a market salary deducted, which lowers the figure.
- Rent paid to a property company you also own. Above-market rent between connected parties is a distribution dressed as a cost.
- Personal expenditure run through the business. Vehicles, travel, phones, a family member on payroll who does not work there.
- One-off professional and legal fees. A settled dispute, a failed acquisition, a one-time restructuring.
- Repairs that were really improvements. A new roof expensed as maintenance is a capital item; it should sit on the balance sheet, not in this year's costs.
- Non-recurring items generally. Insurance claims, relocation costs, a single large bad debt, a discontinued product line.
Here is the hard part: every one of these has to be evidenced. A buyer's accountant will ask for the invoice, the payroll record, the market rent comparison. Add-backs you cannot document get struck out in due diligence, and each one struck out costs you its value times the multiple.
The worked example
A business reports $180,000 of EBITDA. Its accounts also contain the following:
| Adjustment | Amount |
|---|---|
| Owner's salary $120,000 against a market rate of $70,000 | +$50,000 |
| Rent to owner's property company, $60,000 against $45,000 market | +$15,000 |
| Roof replacement expensed as repairs | +$22,000 |
| Legal fees on a one-off settled dispute | +$18,000 |
| Owner's vehicle and personal travel | +$9,000 |
| Adjusted EBITDA | $294,000 |
Now apply multiples to both figures:
| Basis | 3× | 4× | 5× |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reported EBITDA, $180,000 | $540,000 | $720,000 | $900,000 |
| Adjusted EBITDA, $294,000 | $882,000 | $1,176,000 | $1,470,000 |
At a 4× multiple, presenting the business on adjusted earnings is worth $456,000 more than presenting it on reported earnings. Same business, same year, same trading.
And notice what the multiple does on its own. On the adjusted figure, the gap between a 3× and a 5× is $588,000 — larger than the entire add-back effect.
In plain English: each dollar of adjusted EBITDA is worth the multiple to you. That $50,000 salary normalisation is not worth $50,000. At 4× it is worth $200,000.
Which is why the second half of this article is the half that pays.
Where the multiple comes from
An EBITDA multiple is a price expressed in years of earnings. It is normally derived from what comparable businesses of similar size actually sold for in the same sector, adjusted for how this particular business differs from those.
For owner-operated small businesses, multiples of roughly 3× to 5× are the usual territory. Larger, more established businesses attract more. A strategic buyer — one purchasing for a specific reason, such as acquiring your customer list, your licence or your location — may pay well above the range, because they are buying something worth more to them than to the open market.
Treat any range you read, including that one, as a starting point rather than an answer. Sector matters enormously. A recurring-revenue software business and a plant hire business with the same EBITDA are not the same asset.
The 11 factors that move your multiple
The principle underneath all of them is simple, and it inverts the usual investing instinct. In investing, higher risk demands higher return. In business valuation, lower risk earns a higher price — because the buyer is purchasing the certainty of your earnings continuing without you.
Every factor below is a buyer asking one question: what happens to this profit after the current owner leaves?
| # | What the buyer examines | The test they actually apply | Effect on multiple |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Management depth | Can the business trade for a month with nobody in the owner's chair? | Higher |
| 2 | Owner dependence | Are the key customer relationships held personally by the owner? | Lower if yes |
| 3 | Customer concentration | Does any single customer exceed 10% of revenue? | Lower if yes |
| 4 | Revenue predictability | What share of next year's revenue is already contracted or recurring? | Higher |
| 5 | Supplier position | Are supply terms contracted, or renegotiated on goodwill each year? | Higher if contracted |
| 6 | Growth record | Has revenue and profit grown consistently, or spiked once? | Higher if consistent |
| 7 | Margin stability | Have gross margins held through cost increases? | Higher |
| 8 | Market direction | Is the niche growing, flat, or structurally declining? | Higher if growing |
| 9 | Barriers to entry | Could a competent competitor replicate this in 12 months? | Higher if no |
| 10 | Quality of records | Are the accounts clean enough to survive due diligence unchanged? | Higher |
| 11 | Transferability | Do leases, licences and accreditations survive a change of ownership? | Higher |
Number 11 is the one that ambushes people. A lease with a landlord's consent clause, or a licence that does not transfer, can stall a completed deal outright — and the discovery usually happens in week six of due diligence, when the buyer has leverage and you have a deadline.
Read that table as a to-do list, not a scorecard. Most of the items are fixable, and each one you fix is worth its improvement times the multiple.
Where our toolkit fits, and where it does not
If you are modelling a sale, a buy-in, or a raise, our Toolkit Pro platform includes a Business Valuation view inside the financial forecast.
It shows three valuations of the same business side by side:
- Discounted cash flow — the present value of your forecast years' cash flow plus a terminal value, discounted at a required return you set.
- Earnings multiple — your final forecast year's EBITDA multiplied by a multiple you choose.
- Net asset value — the equity on your forecast balance sheet.
You control the required return, the long-term growth rate and the EBITDA multiple, and all three figures recalculate from your own numbers. Seeing the three together is the useful part: when the DCF and the multiple disagree sharply, that gap is usually telling you something about the forecast worth investigating before a buyer does.
Now the honest limitation. The EBITDA the tool multiplies is the EBITDA in your forecast. It does not go looking through your accounts for add-backs, and it does not score the 11 factors above to pick your multiple for you.
Those two jobs are judgement, and judgement is the part a buyer's accountant will argue with. If you want the tool to reflect normalised earnings, you enter the normalised figures — a market-rate salary rather than yours, market rent rather than connected-party rent. The financial forecast is the place to do it.
If you would rather not make those calls yourself, that is what the service below is for.
Request received
We will come back to you the same working day with the list of figures we need.
What to do next
Pick the single largest add-back in your own accounts and price it properly: take the amount, multiply it by 4, and that is roughly what documenting it is worth to you.
If it is worth more than an afternoon of your time, gather the evidence for it now — before a buyer's accountant asks and you are searching for a three-year-old invoice under deadline.
Holding a stake rather than the whole company? The arithmetic here gives you the whole-entity value, which is only the starting point — see minority shareholder valuation discounts for what comes off it and why.
This article is general information about valuation practice, not accounting, tax or legal advice for your situation.